Pelham Lake Park, Rowe, Massachusetts

Implementing a forest climate plan on 1,250 acres to protect and steward the land for wildlife and recreational use in perpetuity

Pelham Lake Park is a treasured forest and lake landscapeย locatedย in the heart of Rowe, Massachusetts.ย Theย 1,345-acreย park occupies most of the northern triangle of land between Pond Road and Davis Mine Road. Overย 1,260ย of these acres are forested.ย Anotherย 81 acresย makesย upย the surface area ofย Pelhamย Lake itself.ย From the shores ofย the lake, the forest stretches up the mountainsideย andย providesย a range of ecotypes, places to explore, andย habitatย for wildlife.ย Over twenty miles of trails windย through theย park,ย providingย accessย and recreational opportunitiesย forย local residentsย and nearby community members.ย The Town of Rowe Park Commission, who stewards the park, is intentionallyย managing forย a resilient forestย using a combination of passive and active approaches. About half of Pelham Lake Park isย designatedย asย a wildlandsย preserve,ย whereย passive management allowsย natural disturbanceย to beย the primary driver of change. In some areas outside of the wildlands preserve, active management is used to protect speciesย impactedย by forest pests and increase the diversity of young trees across theย landscape.ย A forest with healthy trees of all ages and diversity of species will be able to better adapt to climate change impacts that are increasing over time, sustaining ecological health,ย biodiversityย and species richness in the park.ย 

Desired Outcomes

At the start of the management planning process,ย stewardship goalsย were created through an iterativeย process involving town residents, the Rowe Parks Commission, the Park Manager, and the consulting forestersย hired to prepare the plan.ย Community-centered planning, outreach, education, and consensus buildingย allowed townย residentsย to beย directly involved with decisions relating to the stewardship of their forests and the use of sustainable forest management practicesย (seeย Project Statusย section, below).ย 

Through this process, the town identified significant vulnerabilities in the forest (see Challenges, below). A healthy and resilient future forest with a diverse array of species was identified early on as an important climate-adaptation outcome that would inform the management actions taken on this land. Tackling the Parkโ€™s primary vulnerability to climate change — a lack of young tree seedlings and saplings (regeneration) — was a critical priority. ย 

A focus on facilitating natural processes that improved forest regeneration and diversity was identified as critical to project success. Recognizing that the target forest condition needed structural complexity and multiple age classes of trees, Rowe embraced management concepts informed by ecological knowledge and innovative forestry practices. Planting and protecting a younger cohort of trees was considered an important step, as was protecting and passively managing parts of the forest that could remain undisturbed. These passively managed areas can allow for natural processes to play out and offer an alternate adaptation pathway when other areas of the park are more actively stewarded.ย ย Outside of the wildland reserve areas, the townโ€™s stewardship efforts focused on actively diversifying the forest understory, a priority because of site wide impacts of deer browse, which have required the town to think creatively to promote the generation of healthy forest. Additional goals focused on monitoring and countering the impacts of invasive species in the park, including small populations of invasive plants, pests and pathogens. Maintaining and improving recreational and education opportunities were also identified as high priority.ย 

Challenges

Pelham Lake Park is an important ecological area that presents both huge opportunities and high vulnerability and risks. This large, natural forest provides a place for a diversity of species to flourish, and fortunately the presence of invasive plant species on the land is relatively minimal. Management decisions on this unique landscape needed to consider several often overlapping and compounding factors that influence forest health.ย 

Climate Changeย 

Altered precipitation patterns and extreme weather events are expected in this region. These dramatic changes can influence or damage trail infrastructure, forest ecological health, and hydrologic patterns. Higher winter temperatures are a compounding factor in managing pest and pathogen stressors (see below), as they increase survivability of species whose populations have historically been held in check by cold temperatures.ย 

Deer Pressureย 

Abundant white-tailed deer populations are damaging local ecosystems through extensiveย andย damaging browsing. Historically, the number of deer on the landscape has been held in check through predatory pressure.ย With the extirpation of predators likeย wolvesย and mountainย lionsย and less human hunting,ย populations have boomed.ย Since they browse extensively on young shoots and saplings, forestย plantย andย tree diversity isย suffering.ย 

Pests and Pathogensย 

Hemlock wooly adelgid, emerald ash borer, beech bark disease and the rapidly increasing presence of beech leaf disease in the region are impacting the health and survival of hemlock, beech and white ash trees in the park. Hemlock and beech are both shade-tolerant, long-lived tree species that provide important resources to wildlife. White ash is less common in the park but would be a species expected to do well as the climate changes if not for the current extreme threat of mortality. ย 

Land Use Historyย 

Pelham Lake Park is on the unceded lands of multiple Indigenous communities, this includes the Nipmuc/k who are still present and actively caring for land in the region and the Stockbridge Munsee who have been displaced to reservations outside the state but maintain a presence in what is now known as Western Massachusetts. Prior to the violent actions of the occupying colonial government to remove Indigenous peoples from the landscape, there were manyย Indigenous communitiesย who played a role in stewarding the area now known as Pelham Lake Parkย and have since lost relationship with the land.ย ย During European colonization,ย theย areaย wasย intensively deforestedย for agriculture. Today, the forest reflects the changes that this history introduced: a simplified composition and structure that does not support or accurately reflectย the pre-colonial biodiversityย and structural complexityย once present on this land. Thisย degraded condition of theย forestย increasesย the impacts ofย diseases,ย pests, and other disturbances that are now being intensified by climate change.ย ย 

Reserve Designationย 

The Pelham Lake Park charterย indicatesย that many areasย (about half of the acreage)ย in the parkย areย designatedย as โ€œcovenant areas,โ€ whichย are defined as areas that areย free fromย any management or human influence, including deer hunting andย timber harvesting. However,ย in light ofย the challenges outlined here, there are many novel risks to the forest that the covenant authors could not have predicted.ย Whileย designatingย reservesย is a climate smart forestry practice, reserves are best designated based on an analysis ofย long-termย vulnerability and should save room for adaptiveย managementย in the event ofย extreme events such as a pest or pathogen outbreak.ย The covenants were not written with vulnerabilityย or adaptive land care in mindย which has presented challengesย as to how to address the extreme impacts of deer and to respond to the impacts of pests like emerald ash borer.ย ย 

Site Dynamics

The hydrology of the park is complex and includes many flashy mountain streams draining off the peaks ofย Mountsย Adams and Todd;ย a set of more established brooks and wetlands in the lowlands; vernal poolsย andย marshy areas;ย and of course, theย lake. Potter Brook and Tuttle Brook joinย near the parkโ€™sย northernย boundaryย and then flow together into theย eastern side of the lake. Exiting theย lake, Pelham Brook then flows on to join the Deerfield Riverย about 4 miles downstream. Davis Mine Brook has its headwaters in the eastern uplands of the park.ย Climate change modeling scenarios for the regionย indicateย a high likelihood of increased and more intense precipitation events that will test the limits of the natural hydrology hereย and could be a consideration forย maintainingย the dam at the outlet of the lake.ย 

Winter view of Pelham Lake Park
Photo, Emily Boss

Aย historicalย farm abandonment land use patternย is typicalย across much of the Pelham Lake Park Woods, as it is across much of New England. Stonewalls, wire fencing, and modified soil profiles attest to the agricultural past.ย The historic legacies of stone piles in old mowing, animal pens, cellar holes, and barn foundations all tell the tale of Europeanย settlersโ€™ past here. Prior to removal and dispossession of the landย many Indigenous Peoples including theย Mohican,ย Wabanaki, and Nipmucย Tribesย used these uplands as fishing and hunting grounds.ย Members of Indigenous Tribes are presentย in the regionย todayย andย participateย in important stewardship and care for the land.ย 

Climate-Smart Management Practices

  1. Implement climate resilience harvest that includes two patch cuts and installation of a slash wall
    1. Create early successional habitat
    2. Establish reserve trees in harvest area
    3. Install slash walls to protect demonstration areas from deer browse
    4. Implement practices to minimize soil disturbance
    5. Maintain woody debris on site to optimize carbon storage
    6. Retain existing snags and/or create new snags during harvest
    7. Install water bars to manage run-off
  2. Protect ash trees
  3. Monitor hemlock plots
  4. Enhance old growth areas
  5. Control invasive plants
  6. Enhance forest regeneration (underplantings, openings, deer browse exclosures)
  7. Protect and improve recreational infrastructure
  8. Retain a diversity of large, live trees

Project Action Steps

Management Strategy

The consulting foresters hired by the Town of Rowe prescribed specific interventions to meet the communitiesโ€™ goals at Pelham Lake Park. These strategies were designed to address the challenges outlined above while simultaneously and proactively preparing for new or expected challenges in the future. These strategies ranged from active and โ€œhands-on,โ€ to a more passive approach of allowing natural processes to evolve without human intervention. ย 

In theย covenant areas of the park where active management is limitedย and a moreย passive approach is appropriate, the Town elected to focus on enhancing educational and recreational opportunities. A trail assessment generated a database of all trails in the park and diagnosed their current and future needs, including predictions about climate change impacts. This work resulted in the sunsetting of one trail that was being eroded and the creation of a new trail nearby with signage to educate visitors about old-growth structure and function. A timeline for trail improvements was created from this work. This data was also used to create an updated map of park trails.ย 

Park managers also chose to leave aย portionย of the park by the Davis Mine trailhead completely unmanaged. This will allow them, as well as members of the community, to see how these areas evolve over time, and compare them to the areas where the resilience practices were implemented.ย 

In the non-covenant areas of the park, anย active managementย approach has beenย initiatedย toย address identified vulnerabilities over time.ย These actions includeย controlling invasive plants,ย transitioningย areas of forest dominated by Americanย beech to a more diverseย suite ofย climate adaptedย species andย creating young forest to increase structural diversityย acrossย the landscape.ย Implementing a harvest focused on regeneration, climate resilience, and biodiversity was a key step to achieving these goals.ย This required the identification and implementation of several goals and supporting forestry actions, which are outlined in theย Climate Smart Management Actionsย section, below.ย 

Photo, Josh Rapp

Climate Smart Management Actions

The Town of Rowe, working with forestry partners, ecologists and other stakeholders, has begun implementing several โ€œclimate-smartโ€ practices across Pelham Lake Park. The actions are โ€œclimate-smartโ€ because they focus on mitigating climate change by balancing carbon sequestration and storage across the short and long term while adapting the forest to climate change by diversifying the composition and structure of the forest and meeting the needs of park users.ย ย The individual practices are described below starting with the more passive management end of the management spectrum and ending with those on the more active end of the spectrum.ย 

Implement climate resilience harvestย ย 

The town, project stakeholders, and local partners agreed toย conductย a small resilience harvestย in the winter of 2025-26.ย ย The harvestย consisted ofย two side-by-side 2-acre group selections with reserves, which strategicallyย retainedย specific trees in an otherwise clear-cut patch.ย The trees that wereย retainedย areย adaptedย to climate changeย andย willย promote a new generation of trees by acting as a seed source.ย The forestย opening thatย was createdย will encourage the establishment of young trees and improve forest diversity by allowing sunlight to reach the forest floor. Theย anticipatedย outcome is aย resurgence in regeneration of maple, birch, oak, and spruce; species that will thrive under changing climate conditions at this location.ย 

This harvest activity also included an innovative strategy called a slash wall, a large wall of woody material designed to exclude deer and protect young trees. The wall will slowly biodegrade over time and will not need to be rebuilt or removed. A slash wall will help address the impact deer are having on our forestโ€™s ability to adapt to climate change, while demonstrating innovative solutions to these challenges.

Aerial view of slash wall, (c) Mass Audubon

Enhance old growth areasย 

Old growth forests areย characterized by being messy, complex forest areas withย well-established natural processesย and oftenย large trees. Whileย true old growth isย rare in Massachusetts, sections of Pelham Lake Parkย exhibitย these characteristics andย are on their way toย becoming oldย forestย as they recover from past agricultural use.ย Using a passive (rather than an active) approach to forest management in theย reserveย areas of the park will allow them to naturally evolve towards old-growth conditions. To connect visitors to this landscape, an old growth interpretive trail was installed.ย 

Monitor hemlock plotsย 

Eastern hemlock is at risk of insect infestation. The hemlock wooly adelgid is a tiny insect that disrupts the flow of nutrients to twigs and needles by sucking sap from the tree, thereby killing it. Hemlock is not expected to do well at Pelham Lake Park in the future because of this pressure. Monitoring plots have been established in are four areas as located in stands 5 and 8, which are dominated by hemlock. The presence of HWA and overall tree health will be observed over time. These observations will help inform future management decisions to protect this tree species. ย 

Protect and improve recreational infrastructureย 

Protecting recreational resources was a key goal for the project. In conjunction with forest stewardship planning, a trail assessment and mapping project was completed, and park staff have used this to prioritize trail improvement projects that address climate vulnerabilities. In addition, active management projects have been prioritized near existing trails where educational signage has been installed to amplify the recreational experience. In some cases, trails need to be temporarily closed to carry out active management, but these activities are also opportunities to repair, improve and/or preserve trail access.ย 

Protect ash treesย 

White ash grows well in the climate of Pelham Lake Park, but as with other ash in the region, they are at risk of emerald ash borer (EAB) infestations, which kills the trees. One way to address this issue is to inoculate these trees with pesticides.ย ย In 2022, 10 trees were inoculated and a follow-up treatment was conducted in the spring of 2024 by Long View Forest. More trees may be protected in the future. Keeping a small population of mature ash on the landscape maintains the possibility of the population expanding as biocontrols for EAB become established at the landscape scale and potential genetic resistance develops.ย 

Control invasive plantsย 

Invasive plants can inhibitย the regenerationย of native trees and shrub species. Infestations of bittersweet,ย barberry,ย knotweedย and multifloraย roseย are highly localized inย pocketsย of the park. Removing theseย preventsย their spread, fostersย regeneration, protectsย biodiversity,ย and reducesย future threats to ecological function.ย ย 

Enrichment plantingย 

A lack of regeneration reduces long-term resilience in a forest ecosystem. A healthy northern hardwood forest should have different age classes of trees, including young seedlings and saplings which could grow to maturity as older trees die. In many areas of Pelham Lake Park, beech sprouts are the dominant species in the understory. This is because beech dying from beech bark disease sprout prolifically and the buds and leaves are ignored by deer which preferentially browse of species like oaks and maples. To improve the diversity of tree seedlings in the forest understory and ultimately replace the hard mast being lost as beech declines, red and white oaks have been planted in the understory in five patches in the forest, ranging from half to one acre in size. Beech seedlings and saplings were first cut in these areas to reduce the competition for planted seedlings. One- to two-yead-old bareroot seedlings were then planted and protected with tree tubes to reduce damage from deer. In some patches, overstory diseased beech were girdled after seedling establishment to increase the amount of light available for seedling growth. Beech leaf disease is now impacting both understory and overstory beech in the park, increasing the need to establish young trees of more species in the forest understory.ย 

Table 1. Overview of Climate Resilience Goals and Actions

Project Status

The management work was enabled by an intentional and comprehensive project plan that incorporated voices from many stakeholders. This plan will evolve over time.ย To date, the majority ofย climateย smart practices have been implemented.ย Park managers will continue toย monitorย and maintain thisย workย and adapt management approaches in the future as the results of this work start to manifest on the landscape.ย As new vulnerabilities and opportunities arise, they will be able to adjust the plan and priorities to address them.ย 

Project Timelineย 

  1. Invasive Plant Management: 2020-2025ย 
  2. Ash Inoculation:ย 2022,ย 2024ย 
  3. Recreational Infrastructure: 2021ย 
  4. Hemlock Monitoring Installed: Spring 2022ย 
  5. Old Growth Forest Enhancement Area: 2022 (on-going)ย 
  6. Public Input and Consideration: Fall 2023 – Spring 2024ย 
  7. Secure Grant Funding: Spring 2024ย ย 
  8. Contracting & Signage Development: Summer 2024ย 
  9. Beech Control:ย Summer 2024ย 
  10. Harvest & Slash Wall Construction: Winter 2026ย 
  11. Assisted Natural Regeneration:ย Summerย 2026 & 2027ย 
  12. Monitoring:ย Ongoingย 

Roweโ€™s Park Commissionย raised awareness of this work over the past coupleย yearsย throughย severalย communications and outreach initiatives, as well asย throughย partnership building with forestry experts and community organizations, including theย Woodlands Partnership ofย Northwest Massachusetts, Massย Audubonย and Long View Forest.ย ย 

  • During the development of the forest stewardship plans for this site community input, provided via a survey in May of 2020 and two Forest Stewardship Planning workshops (June 3, 2020ย & August 27th, 2020) informed the goals and management recommendations that were selected for the site.ย ย 
  • Public information sessions were held to explain selected management practices, methods, and timelines, with opportunities for Q&A on 10/23/2023 and 11/01/2023.ย ย 
  • Guidedย woodsย walks were held to allow community members to see the project area, learn about the practices, and ask questions on site. Woods walks during theย initialย forest stewardship planning period were cancelled due to the Pandemic (2020) but walks focusing on the selected management practices were held on 04/29/2023 and 05/02/2024.ย ย 
  • Parks Commission Meetings: Routine updates on the project were offered at the Rowe Parks Commission Meetings including on 03/09/2022, 03/04/2024, 04/11/2024, 05/02/2024, 06/26/2024, 09/05/2025, 11/03/2025.ย ย 
  • Information on the project, links to planning documents, and publication of information sessions were included in a town-wide mailing in October of 2023.ย ย 
  • Regular project updates were offered through the Town website, email lists, the Goal Post (Town newsletter), andย trailhead kiosks.ย ย 
  • Focus groups on educational materials: Publicly promoted focus groups on the development of educational materials forย https://theforestcenter.org/ย  were held with Park staff, town officials, consultants, community groups,ย indigenousย communitiesย and interested residents. These took place on 06/06/2023, 03/04/2024, 04/11/2024,ย and 04/17/2024.ย 
  • Partnership building with regional forestry experts, conservation organizations, schools, and local groups to broaden support and knowledge sharing.ย ย 

The park manager and other project stakeholders will continue to monitor this work and adapt management approaches as the forest responds and new pressures are introduced. Over time, they will identify new, impactful opportunities to preserve Pelham Lake Park with long-term health and resilience in mind.

Contact:

Andrew Randazzo
Forest Ecologist
Mass Audubon
arandazzo@massaudubon.org
413-252-9534
massaudubon.org/climateforestry

Acknowledgments

Special thanks toย Rick Whitney of Mass Audubon,ย Emily Boss of Massachusetts Woodlands Institute,ย Alex Barrett of Longview Forest, Mary Wigmoreย ofย Wigmore Forest Resources,ย and theย Roweย Park Commission for their help preparing this case studyย 

Pelham Lake, Pelham Lake Park, Rowe, Massachusetts
View across Pelham Lake (c) Emily Boss

Fast Facts

Town:

Rowe

Project Location:

Pelham Lake Park

Native Heritage:

The land is in the town of Rowe, MA on unceded land of the Mohican, Wabanaki, and Nipmuc First Nations (Learn whose land youโ€™re on)

Project Proponent:

The Town of Rowe

Landowner Type:

Municipal

Project Stakeholders:

Town of Rowe, Pelham Lake Park Commission, Park Manager, Rowe Selectboard, Forestersย Alex Barrett and Mary Wigmore, Municipal Vulnerability Grant Program, Woodlands Partnership of Western Massachusetts,ย Mass Audubon, New England Forestry Foundation, Franklin Regional Council of Governments, No Loose Braids,ย Chagwasย Cultural Consulting,ย Ohketeauย Cultural Center

Goals:

Forestย reserves, old growth enhancement, eastern hemlock monitoring, resilience patch cuts, deer browse management, white ash inoculation, enrichment planting andย assistedย natural regeneration.

 

Management Practices Applied:

Forest protection, understory planting and monitoring, invasive and pest management, old growth forest enhancements, community educational programs, patch cut, slash wall